This is a personal diary, and in no way reflects any opinion or view of the Spiritual Organization that I am part of. I have always lived my heart on my sleeve; so, I guess you read what I think and live. Regarding my spiritual affiliation: If you ask me whether I am a Sai devotee, my answer is No. I am not a Sai devotee if it goes to mean that I follow the teachings of Sai. But I am a Sai devotee if you refer to my Absolute Devotion to the form that embodies Absolute Reality.
Thursday, November 25, 2010
SERIOUS STUFF: Talking your way to Cancer
She's beautiful, so that's ok
Sunday, November 21, 2010
Wandering minds less happy than focused ones
Reading Between the Lines - 34 - Lizard gives hope to women around the world
Sunday, November 14, 2010
Akhand and Inspired
Thursday, November 11, 2010
Reading Between the Lines - 33 - Ideology of Convenience
Reading Between the Lines - 32 - Insecurity about the Security Council
Monday, November 8, 2010
Festival of Lightness of Being
We have just celebrated Diwali, the Festival of Light, that dispels darkness. And what darkness would that be? The Darkness of ignorance.Monday, November 1, 2010
Reading Between the Lines - 31 - Chidambaram and the Virtue of Impotency
Che

Spirit of the Spirited
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Reading Between the Lines - 30 - India disappoints yet again
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
Reading Between the Lines - 29 - Supreme Scam
Monday, October 25, 2010
Reading Between the Lines - 28 - Arundhati's absurdities
Saturday, October 23, 2010
Father Teresa - Vote for him!

Wednesday, October 13, 2010
International insult to China
Eating arrogant pie
Friday, October 8, 2010
Reading Between the Lines - 27 - Idols represent the appropriate ideology
Reading Between the Lines - 26 - India fails to impress doomsayers
Flash news: Pakistan passes 07-10-2010 without single bomb blast
Monday, October 4, 2010
Where do we start?
Thursday, September 30, 2010
Common misunderstanding
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Reading Between the Lines - 25 - Psychological Gerrymandering
Reading Between the Lines - 24 - Playing to the crowd
Flash news: Resolution of Kashmir only solution to match-fixing scandal
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Flash News: Attack on Indian not racially motivated!
I am no longer successful

Flash news: At least 50% of second-rung will compete!
Friday, September 24, 2010
Why God punished Stephen Hawking right from birth
Thursday, September 23, 2010
The Song of the Universe

Wednesday, September 22, 2010
Reading Between the Lines - 23 - Commonwealthy politicians
Death to Civilization by Stoning
The most important Question of our life

Tuesday, September 21, 2010
Where do we go from here?
Monday, August 2, 2010
SABN Speaketh: On not minding the matter
There is a time and place to say things especially the truth. If the time and/or the place is not ripe, Silence is the most appropriate statement to make!
Bhagavad Gita 17:15- anudvega-karam vakyam satyam priya-hitam ca yat svadhyayabhyasanam caiva van-mayam tapa ucyate "Austerity of speech consists in speaking words that are truthful, pleasing, beneficial, and not agitating to others"
“Saying what you feel’ if it hurts or agitates the others, no matter how truthful the saying, is “himsa”
Further Swamy Says "Even if you cannot oblige, you can at least speak obligingly. This means that you have to cleanse your speech of cynicism and satire and be ever sincere and sweet. You may differ from co-workers on methods and programmes, but this should not leave a scar on your heart or their heart...”
“Both unpleasant truth and pleasant untruth have to be avoided.”
---
SABN Sir,
I see your well-reasoned points, and I know for sure that they are sincere. If I can have some more of your input to our discussion, and Swami presents the right course of action through them, you can be sure that there will be no further public statements in my private site! I guess the Socratic method suits best, as the many more years that you have will present richer experience, and thereby, wiser thoughts.
Bhagavad Gita 17:15- anudvega-karam vakyam satyam priya-hitam ca yat svadhyayabhyasanam caiva van-mayam tapa ucyate "Austerity of speech consists in speaking words that are truthful, pleasing, beneficial, and not agitating to others"
Now, Krishna talks of austerity by using 'truth' as the first adjective, not 'pleasing' not, 'not agitating'. What if the truth were not pleasant? And what if the silence continued to the extent that pleasantness of speech became an acceptable, and probably necessary substitute for truthfulness of speech? Secondly, in such a circumstance, is it more beneficial to let untruth flourish without hindrance (to the extent that a spiritual monument becomes a platform for spiritual performance rather than spiritual penance), at the expense of words which are disruptive, no doubt, but probatory for good reason?
“Saying what you feel’ if it hurts or agitates the others, no matter how truthful the saying, is “himsa”
What about saying what you don’t feel as it will please and ingratiate others, no matter how untruthful the saying. Which is the greater evil here, the himsa of the truthful word, or the ahimsa of the sweet lie,- if at all the latter is ahimsa?
Further Swamy Says "Even if you cannot oblige, you can at least speak obligingly. This means that you have to cleanse your speech of cynicism and satire and be ever sincere and sweet. You may differ from co-workers on methods and programmes, but this should not leave a scar on your heart or their heart...”Kerala is a Communist state, and for obvious reasons, the states with one of the most outstanding records for un-industrialization in India. One entrepreneur from Kerala settled in Singapore (or somewhere else I don’t really recollect where) and engaged in the shipping business decided to order two vessels from Cochin Shipyard, whilst Korean shipbuilders offered slightly higher prices, but with accurate deliveries. But this guy was patriotic and tried to engage even the lower-level workforce from Cochin Shipyard so that they too would realize the importance of playing to international rules (for their own benefit). He was very sweet and cordial, and to the cut the story short, he learned a very expensive lesson. This happened around four years back.
Another story, and this is based on personal experience. We have factory-people who come from many different states of South and North India. Now, I always have problems with people of two specific states. I can be sweet and cordial and keep getting a hit to our productivity, and consequently, to the entire company, or I can let go of a few rotten apples to save the rest of them. What I have done in the past is the practical thing from my perspective, not the benevolent thing, but the practical thing.
I will totally obey what the Avatar says on leaving hearts unscarred, but let me also ask this question: When the Avatar asks us to be sincere and sweet, and when the entire focus is on sweetness at the expense of sincerity, what do you think Swami might find more wrong - poison parading as perfume, or the pungent fumes of truth?
Among the very few that I can personally look up to, and currently engaged in some form of official capacity, KN (famous for, among others, ‘we cannot plan for everything, but we can pray for everything’, ‘we should not only serve Swami, but also serve as Swami’) stands out for being genuinely sincere, and incredibly sweet at the same time. But then, how many KNs do we have? So, when the difficult gel of sincerity and sweetness has to be professed, where do you think it should start? I know what you will say (it should start with myself!), but when we have a world full of yes-men, shouldn’t someone say no so that people know there is some kind of divergence of opinion and thought? Hasn’t humanity progressed because a few people at all levels questioned the status quo, whether it be of the geocentric universe, or that of life after death? In my own company, some of the most powerful people are those who will actually question me or counter my point of view. If I am a lawyer, will I make impolite admissions to defend my client, or offer silence to allow his defeat?
“Both unpleasant truth and pleasant untruth have to be avoided.”
Many years back, while in Boeing, I was forwarded a document on a software application named CATIA that was supposed to improve productivity, but did very well to affect the opposite. But after having spent half a billion dollars on the application, decision makers demonstrated perfect non-rational escalation of commitment by pumping more money for this project, in effect, to repaint a house standing on shallow foundation. But a few people felt this was wrong, and just about no one complained. People feared one or more of the following: losing their positions, going out of favour, or appearing to be plain stupid. What do we do under such circumstances? Remaining a mute spectator while claiming to be a foot-soldier of Krishna’s army is, in my opinion, the equivalent of retiring to the forest promptly after securing a PhD in social welfare. Furthermore, in a spiritual setting, do you think that communism of thought and pretense of vision, added to selfishness of interest, should be silently reviewed from the sidelines, or commented upon? Which is the greater evil?
If you still believe that the path of silence is the preferred choice, I will seriously go for it. The thing about Swami is that He gives us mixed signals with one clear message. I guess He wants us to use our viveka. This is where the satsang of the wise will help, and that is why I will agree with your experience.
Saturday, July 31, 2010
On not minding the matter
Scientific Music

Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Another Miss Looks
The Power of Words on YOU
Saturday, July 3, 2010
Going Bananas - Connectivity & Connection: My personal experience
Gulf News, 02-07-10: Going bananas: Reaping the fruits of life. Video Editor Jaye Lentin and his wife have been on a raw food vegan diet for more than a year. Do their lifestyle and large intake of sugary fruits have any adverse effects on their bodies?
By the article itself, GN relates 'effects on their bodies' to effect on health. According to WHO, Health is a state of complete, physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease. This forms the premise of, probably the most important blog I have written so far.
I lived in the US for three years, starting Fall 2000. I led an incredibly solitary life there, shuttling between Salt Lake City and Seattle. By solitary I do not mean abandoned or ostracised, but rather, insulated from what I wanted to be insulated from, and isolated from what I wanted to isolate myself from. This was also the period of my spiritual rebirth.
During this period, I have had the strongest connection with the Cosmic Spirit that subsumes and consumes us all. Here, time and space are as relative as anything else you find relative. Clairvoyance and clairsentience become part of your sensory armour without you knowing they even existed. I dreamt of the 9/11 attack the morning it happened. I dreamt of the New York plane crash two months later. These are major incidents. Many minor incidents would flash to the mind's eye before they happened. I dreamt of my grandmother's passing on a week before it took place. I would have the Avatar's Dream almost every week. I dreamt of Jesus twice. And as the greatest spiritual celebration of my life, I had a vision of Krishna one night in my bedroom, when I was far from asleep. Although it lasted for maybe 2 seconds, these seconds constitute the greatest temporal embellishment of my life.
Now, how does all this relate to Going Bananas? You are what you eat. What you eat is not just from the mouth alone. During these years, I ate bland, tasteless food. I was vegan. Vegetables were half-cooked. I abjured salt, spice, sugar, chilli and anything that would even marginally titillate the tongue. Not just that. I lived on a very spiritual diet. TV was minimal or non-existent. I meditated twice a day. I read spiritual books. I detached myself from everything else. And so, what all happened then, happened then.
When the food that you take in through the five senses is sathwic, your antennas get detoxed, and therefore, you can connect. But everything has to start from the 10% of the tongue where the taste-buds of delusion lie. Once everything reaches the stomach, it's one mass of mashed everything. But how many of us would like to think so? My personal experience is testament to the eternal truth that you are what you eat.
Disclaimer: To distress you no further, I am no longer an Aumnivore and back to my herbivorous ways now. I am not single any more, and we live as one big mingling family now. It is difficult for my to emphasise my vegan point of view to a vegetarian home. Besides, I am no longer insulated and isolated, and back to the sewer of the material morass. So, no more visions and other esoteric situations.
Then again, head in the forest and hands in sick society. One should do what one can, in spite of one's situation. And go bananas when no one is watching! P.
Gulf News, 02-07-10: Going bananas: Reaping the fruits of life. Video Editor Jaye Lentin and his wife have been on a raw food vegan diet for more than a year. Do their lifestyle and large intake of sugary fruits have any adverse effects on their bodies?
By the article itself, GN relates 'effects on their bodies' to effect on health. According to WHO, Health is a state of complete, physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease. This forms the premise of, probably the most important blog I have written so far.
I lived in the US for three years, starting Fall 2000. I led an incredibly solitary life there, shuttling between Salt Lake City and Seattle. By solitary I do not mean abandoned or ostracised, but rather, insulated from what I wanted to be insulated from, and isolated from what I wanted to isolate myself from. This was also the period of my spiritual rebirth.
During this period, I have had the strongest connection with the Cosmic Spirit that subsumes and consumes us all. Here, time and space are as relative as anything else you find relative. Clairvoyance and clairsentience become part of your sensory armour without you knowing they even existed. I dreamt of the 9/11 attack the morning it happened. I dreamt of the New York plane crash two months later. These are major incidents. Many minor incidents would flash to the mind's eye before they happened. I dreamt of my grandmother's passing on a week before it took place. I would have the Avatar's Dream almost every week. I dreamt of Jesus twice. And as the greatest spiritual celebration of my life, I had a vision of Krishna one night in my bedroom, when I was far from asleep. Although it lasted for maybe 2 seconds, these seconds constitute the greatest temporal embellishment of my life.
Now, how does all this relate to Going Bananas? You are what you eat. What you eat is not just from the mouth alone. During these years, I ate bland, tasteless food. I was vegan. Vegetables were half-cooked. I abjured salt, spice, sugar, chilli and anything that would even marginally titillate the tongue. Not just that. I lived on a very spiritual diet. TV was minimal or non-existent. I meditated twice a day. I read spiritual books. I detached myself from everything else. And so, what all happened then, happened then.
When the food that you take in through the five senses is sathwic, your antennas get detoxed, and therefore, you can connect. But everything has to start from the 10% of the tongue where the taste-buds of delusion lie. Once everything reaches the stomach, it's one mass of mashed everything. But how many of us would like to think so? My personal experience is testament to the eternal truth that you are what you eat.
Disclaimer: To distress you no further, I am no longer an Aumnivore and back to my herbivorous ways now. I am not single any more, and we live as one big mingling family now. It is difficult for my to emphasise my vegan point of view to a vegetarian home. Besides, I am no longer insulated and isolated, and back to the sewer of the material morass. So, no more visions and other esoteric situations.
Then again, head in the forest and hands in sick society. One should do what one can, in spite of one's situation. And go bananas when no one is watching! P.